Peter Shops for Near-Field Monitors


Why?

I'm having trouble mixing down songs on my computer using just my headphones or my tiny computer speakers. People on the homrecording.com BBS said I would have better results if I get a pair of proper studio monitors, which would distort the signal less and allow me to hear my recordings in greater detail.

Plus I could listen to other people's recordings in greater detail, which could be educational.


What Am I Looking For?

I'm looking to spend about $200-$300 on a pair of powered monitors. (I know -- yikes.)

I would be mixing poorly-written pop music, tending to folk when it's just me and a guitar.

I need the speakers to reproduce my sound as accurately as possible, so that I may de-crappify it as much as possible in the mix.


Why Not Spend More?

I'm in a non-ideal recording environment (my apartment), using low-end pro-sumer recording gear, so there is a somewhat low ceiling on how good things really can sound.

Accurate deep-bass frequencies are useless to me, for example, because the room would just garble them up. (Perhaps the nature of the room would indicate that even cheaper monitors are in order. I will have to think about this.)

Additionally, I don't see myself putting in six-hour mixing sessions, so aural fatigue is perhaps less of a concern than one might think.

Finally, I haven't had monitors before, so even if none of the above were true, I would still do better to have cheaper 'learning monitors' so I would know what I'm looking for in the more expensive models.


Guides

Navigating reviews of studio monitors is hell. It's incredibly subjective, and the jargon is sometimes vague -- "This sounds 'present' but 'harsh.'" At any rate, here are some overviews of the market:


Shops


Possibilities

Note -- it looks like lots of people on the homerecording.com bbs recommend the Yorkville YSM-1p, but it's a bit too expensive ($450) and hard to find online.